PEMBUATAN SENTRIFUG GEOTEKNIS DI UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA (UKM) UNTUK KAJIAN LINGKUNGAN

Authors

  • Muchlis - Jurusan Teknik Geologi, IST AKPRIND Yogyakarta
  • Sukandarrumidi - Jurusan Teknik Geologi, IST AKPRIND Yogyakarta
  • Wan Zuhairi Wan Yaacob Program Geologi, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor
  • Muhammad Mukhlisin Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Politeknik Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34151/technoscientia.v5i2.541

Keywords:

geotechnical sentrifug, building, environmental studies

Abstract

Many researchers were conducted using geotechnical sentrifug in studies of the environment. The advantages of using a geotechnical sentrifug are quick to obtain the results, less materials used, economical and can be controlled for factors that are not required in the test. All geotechnical sentrifugs that were conducted are located outside from Indonesia and Malaysia, so that requires for build a geotechnical sentrifug in the country. Engineering methodology was to modify the existing geotechnical sentrifug in other countries. The geotechnical sentrifug that was build Universiti Kebangsaan Malay-sia is 50 cm radius beam type geotechnical sentrifug with dead lock capacity 6 kg and maximum acceleration around 75 gravity. The main components are body, arm, bucket sample, counter weight, motor, contaminant bottle and computer. The geo-technical sentrifug is equipped with speed sensor, close sensor, stroboscope sensor and vibration sensor. This geotechnical sentrifug was conducted in environmental studies.

References

Barth, G.B., Illangasekare, T.H. & Rajaram, H. 2003. The effect of entrapped nonaqueous phase liquids on tracer transport in heterogeneous porous media: laboratory experiments at the intermediate scale. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 67: 247– 268.
Esposito, G., Allersma, H.G.B & Selva-durai, A.P.S. 1999. Sentrifug modeling of LNAPL transport in partially saturated sand. Journal Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 125 (12): 1066-1071.
HDR Engineering. 2001. Handbook of Public Water System. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Hu, L. M., Irene, M. C. L. & Meegoda, J. N. 2006. Sentrifug testing of NAPL migration and soil vapor extraction for soil remediation. Practice Periodical of hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste management 10 (1): 33-39.
Kumar, P.R. 2006. An experimental methodology for monitoring contaminant transport through geotechnical sentrifug models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 117: 215-233.
Lo, I.M.C., Hu, L.M. & Meegoda, J.N. 2004. Sentrifug modeling of light nonaqueous phase liquids transport in unsaturated soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering 130 (5): 535-539.
Mukhlisin, M., Ilyas Idris, Z. Wan, Y Wan, R.T Mohd. 2011. Soil slope deformation in relation to soil water interaction in based on sentrifug physical modeling. International Journal Physical Science 6 (13): 3126-3133.
Marto, A, Makhtar, A.M, Kassim K.A, Yaacob W.Z & Muhardi. 2009. Physical Modelling of Fly Ash Embankmentin Mini geotechnical Sentrifug. Prosiding International Conference of Sustainable Infrastructure and Built Environment in Developing Countries: 76-82. Bandung.
Nambi, I.M. & Powers, S. E. 1999. NAPL dissolution in heterogeneous system: an experimental investtigation in a simple heterogeneous system. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 44 : 161-184.
Schnoor, J.L. 1996. Environmental modeling: Fate and Transport of Pollutants in Water, Air and Soil. New York: John Wiley and Sons, inc.
Soga, K., Kawabarata, J., Kechavarzi, C., Coumoulos, H. & Waduga, W.A.P. 2003. Sentrifug modelling of nonaqueous phase liquid movement and entrapment in unsaturated layered soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 129 (2): 173-182.
Wilson, D.J. & Clarke, A.N(editor). 2004. Hazardous waste site soil remediation. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

Downloads

Published

01-02-2013

How to Cite

-, M., -, S., Wan Yaacob, W. Z., & Mukhlisin, M. (2013). PEMBUATAN SENTRIFUG GEOTEKNIS DI UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA (UKM) UNTUK KAJIAN LINGKUNGAN. JURNAL TEKNOLOGI TECHNOSCIENTIA, 5(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.34151/technoscientia.v5i2.541