EVALUASI PELAYANAN KUALITAS AGENCY BANK “X” DI SURABAYA

Authors

  • Eko Nurmianto
  • Lantip Trisunarno
  • Hary Sudjono

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34151/technoscientia.v0i0.1982

Keywords:

service quality, bank agency, gap 1, gap 5

Abstract

Research objective is to determine difference between customer’s expectation towards service quality and management perception on customer expectation. Research advantages (1) to obtain clear information on customers’  expectation and perception as well as to improve its service quality, and (2) to know the problem inside the agency. Methodology Customer Questionnaires consist of 4 parts, Part I: 8 qualitatif question (customer demography), Part II : 17 Customer Perception Questions, Part III : 17 Customer Expectation Questions, Part IV: Open Question for Weighted Importance of 5 SERVQUAL dimension. Management Questionnaires consist of 3 parts, Part I : 4 questions (management demography and working duration), Part II : 17 customer perception questions, management on customer expectation towards service execution,  Part III : Open Question for Weighted Importance of 5 SERVQUAL dimension. Data Analysis Methodology: Descriptive, Cluster, Discriminant, and Dependency Analysis, SERVQUAL Analisis on Gap 5 and Gap 1. Results : Gap 1 cluster 1 require improvement on variable 5 (service always free from errors), for cluster 2 on variable 10 (if error occur then agency would fix). Gap 5 cluster 1 needs improvement variable 5 (service always free from errors), variable 8 (service always suit to the promises), variable 9 (customer complaint would be honestly responsed), and variable 11 (hospitality of agency Bank staff), for cluster 2 on variable 17 (sympathy agency staff). Based on Importance-Performance Graph, variable which is need to be fixed on cluster 1 is variable 8 (service always suit to the promises). Cluster 2 variable which is need is variable 8 (service always suit to the promises) and  variable 10 ((if error occur then agency would fix).

References

Azwar, S., 1997, Reliabilitas dan Validi-tas, Edisi Ketiga, Cetakan Perta-ma, Pustaka Pelajar
Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., 1991, Princi-ples of Marketing, Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Kotler, P, 1995, Manajemen Pemasaran: Analisis, Perencanaan, Imple-mentasi dan Pengendalian, Edisi Indonesia, Buku Kesatu, Edisi Kedelapan, Salemba Empat, Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., 1994, Marketing Management : Analysis, Planning, Implemen-tation and Control, Eighth Edi-tion, Prentice Hall International, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jer-sey.
Nurmianto, E., Kurnia, I., 2002, Analisis Kepuasan Pelanggan Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Jasa Teleko-munikasi Seluler Dengan Menga-plikasikan Fuzzy-Servqual Dan Indeks PGCV (Studi Kasus Kartu Pra Bayar Mentari – Satelindo). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pas-ca Sarjana II : Peningkatan Kua-litas Penelitian dan Pendidikan Pasca Sarjana, ITS, 4-5 Septem-ber 2002, hal 1-11
Nurmianto, E., Sinarta, P.T. 2004, Eva-luasi Kompetensi Bank ”X” de-ngan Metode Analytical Hierar-chy Process (AHP). Manajemen Usahawan No. 11 Th XXXIII, November, hal. 29-34
Tjiptono, F., 1998, Manajemen Jasa, E-disi Pertama, Penerbit Andi Off-set, Yogyakarta.
Tjiptono, F., 1997, Prinsip-Prinsip Total Quality Service, Edisi Pertama, Penerbit Andi Offset, Yogyakar-ta.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., Leo-nard L. B, 1990, Delivering Qua-lity Service, Balancing Customer Perception and Expectation, Third Edition, Free Press Inter-national, New York.

Downloads

Published

22-02-2019

How to Cite

Nurmianto, E., Trisunarno, L., & Sudjono, H. (2019). EVALUASI PELAYANAN KUALITAS AGENCY BANK “X” DI SURABAYA. JURNAL TEKNOLOGI TECHNOSCIENTIA, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.34151/technoscientia.v0i0.1982