ANALISIS RISIKO K3 DENGAN METODE HIRARC PADA PROSES BENDING SEMI FINISH PLATE BUMPER HM400 KOMATSU DI PT. KHARISMA LOGAM UTAMA BEKASI

Authors

  • Alexander Gerald Adityamurti Program Studi Teknologi Industri, Fakultas Vokasi, Universitas AKPRIND Indonesia
  • Andrean Emaputra* Program Studi Teknologi Industri, Fakultas Vokasi, Universitas AKPRIND Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34151/prosidingsnast.v1i1.4885

Keywords:

bending process, hazard analysis, HIRARC, occupational safety, risk management

Abstract

The increasing competition in the industrial sector has driven companies to enhance productivity while maintaining the safety standards. PT. Kharisma Logam Utama (KLU), a manufacturing company specializing in metal and machinery components, is a key partner for PT. Komatsu Indonesia, producing parts for heavy equipment such as the KOMATSU HM400 articulated dump truck. The bending process of semi-finished plates, an essential step in bumper production, poses significant risks to worker safety. This study aims to analyze occupational health and safety (OHS) risks using the Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Risk Control (HIRARC) method. Data collection was conducted through direct observation and interviews over August to September 2024. The findings highlight that most risks in the bending area are categorized as Level II (acceptable with monitoring), constituting 45% of identified activities. Level I risks, deemed acceptable, made up 35%, while Level III (problematic, requiring immediate action) constituted 15%. The highest risk level, IV (unacceptable), accounted for 5% and demands urgent corrective measures due to potential serious injuries or fatalities. The analysis identified mechanical hazards such as cuts, pinches, and material falls as prevalent. Implemented controls included personal protective equipment (PPE) like anti-impact gloves, safety boots, and safety goggles, alongside procedural guidelines. The application of the HIRARC method proved effective in prioritizing risk mitigation measures and improving workplace safety, ultimately contributing to a safer production environment.

References

Cooper, D. (2019). Behavioral Safety: A Framework for Success. New York, NY.

Geller, E. S. (2021). The Psychology of Safety Handbook (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 45001:2018 - Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.

Kohn, J. P., & Freund, M. (2020). Risk Management in Manufacturing Industries. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

Nielsen, K. J., & Carlsen, B. (2017). Safety Culture and Safety Climate in the Workplace. Safety Science, 99, 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.006

Petersen, D. (2019). Techniques of Safety Management: A Systems Approach (4th ed.). Des Plaines, IL: American Society of Safety Professionals.

Reason, J. (2016). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Santoso, B. (2020). Penerapan K3 di Industri Manufaktur di Indonesia. Jurnal Keselamatan Kerja Indonesia, 10(2), 50-62.

Syamsuddin, H. (2021). Evaluasi Risiko pada Proses Produksi dengan Pendekatan HIRARC. Jurnal Teknologi Industri, 15(1), 100-110.

Turnbull, R. J., & Mitropoulos, P. (2021). Practical Guide to Safety Management in Manufacturing and Construction. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Downloads

Published

23-11-2024

Issue

Section

Articles